| We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| Allegheny vs Comly Swaps | |
|---|---|
| Topic Started: Jul 1 2008, 01:57 PM (3,070 Views) | |
| ctrabs74 | Jul 20 2008, 08:28 PM Post #31 |
|
Foamer
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Even a 5500 would have very little trouble with the hills on the 27; if you thought the 5900s are going to master those hills, wait until they swap out the Series 50 engines with the ISL's next year. |
![]() |
|
| ctrabs74 | Jul 20 2008, 08:29 PM Post #32 |
|
Foamer
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I would suspect that the artics might be placed on the school trippers that run along the 27 routing, but other than that, I would be shocked to see artics on a regular basis on the 27 this fall... |
![]() |
|
| TRANSIT_FREAK | Jul 20 2008, 08:30 PM Post #33 |
![]()
to Life, Love & LOOT
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
What about an overhaul with an allison transmission? |
![]() |
|
| redarrow5591 | Jul 20 2008, 10:28 PM Post #34 |
|
Light Rail and Railroad Historian
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
They're not doing another 3414. Simple powerplant change......and I'd rather keep the ZF......saves money. |
![]() |
|
| amgkid874 | Jul 20 2008, 10:46 PM Post #35 |
|
Transit Fan
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I'll say this much. If the 6 goes back to Midvale and the 9, 32, 61 and 62 should go back to Allegheny, does that mean the 35 should go with it? Also,while we're at it...why not send part of the 7 back to Midvale, and the 26 and 89 back to Frankford. (that way Kelso can get back to Frankford, where he wants to be...), but we will leave that subject alone all together. Anyoone think that the 25 should be split with Southern? There is a rule now which states: Wherever your vehicle breaks down at, the closest garage has to come and service your vehicle, or bring you a new one, whatever the need calls for. Thats why you might see 8109 at Callowhill, or an ElDorado at Frankford. Before, waiting for a mechanic at Pier 70 when your NABI broke down on the 25 to ocme all the way from Frankford, sucked, when it was your last trip. CA Crafter's right, by the way. Route 6-->Safe than sorry. |
![]() |
|
| CatchingFeelings | Jul 21 2008, 02:09 AM Post #36 |
|
Occasional Rider
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Last wednesday I spotted 7111 pulling put of the Neshaminy Mall! Trainning Bus. My good freind who drives out Frankford told me that Comly will only get 10 Artics, At first the R was being considered for artics as well but they can't make the turn at Wiss Trans Ctr. |
![]() |
|
| redarrow5591 | Jul 21 2008, 07:14 AM Post #37 |
|
Light Rail and Railroad Historian
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
And that's funny because Artics used to be able to make that turn, albeit tightly, but make it. I wonder what 1234 is considering a cutback for the 9, 27, and 65........... |
![]() |
|
| philabob1 | Jul 21 2008, 11:52 AM Post #38 |
|
Advanced Transit Fan
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
While it's not part of a regular service schedule, artics can occasionally be found in the Wissahickon Loop. If anything, the recent modernization has made the turning paths more generous than before. The marked spaces for layovers are only for 40' buses, so this would have to be revised if R's starting using artics (and that might create some space crunches). |
![]() |
|
| philabob1 | Jul 21 2008, 11:58 AM Post #39 |
|
Advanced Transit Fan
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
35 was at Allegheny for a short period in the mid-90's and had its own fleet of 3 35' Neos there. To move it now a similar group of El D's would need to be reassigned from Midvale. When the El D's first arrived, they were supposed to be assigned to 39 but I don't think that lasted very long (if at all). If 39 can be served by them, it would make sense to move 8-10 El D's to Allegheny. 7 was split between Southern and Allegheny until '92 or so when it went to Southern. It was never out of Luzerne or Midvale as far as I know. SEPTA had plans back then to truncate it in Fairmount so it would no longer duplicate the 48 on 29th St but I think those plans are out of the picture now. 25 should probably be split with Southern, although a lot of the peak hour service doesn't get south of Spring Garden St, so you'd end up with the same situation that was on 5 for a while after it was cut short to Market St. |
![]() |
|
| philabob1 | Jul 21 2008, 12:03 PM Post #40 |
|
Advanced Transit Fan
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I would suspect that the artics might be placed on the school trippers that run along the 27 routing, but other than that, I would be shocked to see artics on a regular basis on the 27 this fall...[/quote]The 400's that run to Roman/Hallahan on 9/27 were down to a single trip in the AM last school year, barely running on 27 (staying on Ridge Ave from Cathedral Rd through to Wissahickon) and 2-3 in the outbound, following the same routing. They run out of Allegheny. I can't speak for the PM trips but, having taken the AM one every so often, it could have a 40' bus on it easily. The students much prefer the regular runs (and the other riders would prefer that they found other ways to get to school....!). |
![]() |
|
| 2 users reading this topic (2 Guests and 0 Anonymous) | |
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · Equipment Sightings · Next Topic » |



![]](http://z1.ifrm.com/static/1/pip_r.png)



6:51 PM May 16